<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>the blog of guruz - Latest Comments in p300 Revision 566 released</title><link>http://guruz.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://guruz.disqus.com/p300_revision_566_released/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:03:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: p300 Revision 566 released</title><link>http://blog.guruz.de/2008/01/07/p300-revision-566-released/#comment-3844288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've written a longer response to your e-mail. You can also use p300 if you don't have multicast support by using broadcast or discovery by adding a host manually and then hoping that the remaining hosts will be found via HTTP.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Goetz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: p300 Revision 566 released</title><link>http://blog.guruz.de/2008/01/07/p300-revision-566-released/#comment-3844287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When is says clients on over LAN / VPN  - I guess it is using using multicast to advertise the service? Apart from Cisco, there are not many routers supporting Multicast over VPN - are you using a wait to manually search over a different subnet?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>